Page history
11 October 2017
23 March 2017
nah, sokay
-1
I don't think the grudge match section is necessary, or the bot pack part. If you want to add the grudge match back, maybe make it more neutral? .
-576
fair enough. did not notice the joeblo incident was included, my bad
+688
By that logic you can remove from your version of the article everything about the fallout from COID's loss because it pertains to my own actions. So by your article, you've broken your own rule over referencing the builder. Check and mate.
-846
It is an article about COID. Not "Avalanche's building". R4's page doesn't mention how R0B0SH4RK has improved immensely at building etc.
+846
It IS inherently tied to me, because the robot is mine and everyone knows it, and hence I think it is necessary to explain improvements in building. Also, the article you are trying to write shit talks my actions as a user, so you're a hypocrite.
-846
This page isn't about you. It's about your bot.
+846
You don't need the old page content, because that's only intended to say it's shit without saying anything about how I improved. And the image is right there, so they CAN see what I started out with, Shield.
-846
how can anyone see youve improved if they cant even see what you started with LMAO
+1,120
I'll leave this here. That's it. Am I a bad guy for wanting a fair depiction of the fact that I've improved since this robot was made?
-1,120
super salto
+1,520
Undo revision 26908 by S.H.I.E.L.D (talk)
-1,520
22 March 2017
deleting an article just because you dont like it is as immature as it gets. grow up.
+1,520
no edit summary
+10
Blanked the page
-1,449
21 April 2010
no edit summary
+104
Despite COID being such a massive piece of fail, CFTW certainly did not pinned COID. COID was simply unable to move due to fail drive.
+42